Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
+6
Vealdis
Valdir
Shadow-Seeker
Pravenstern
Tysha
Mordred
10 posters
:: Marleons :: Library of Marleons
Page 12 of 12
Page 12 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
I never followed up on that one because I got the feeling you didn't even want to talk with me. Short and strict answer and the feeling you wanted to be somewhere else.
That made Vincent sad
That made Vincent sad
Psychozoa- Distinguished
- Posts : 212
Join date : 2013-07-03
Age : 37
Location : Germany
Character sheet
Character Name: Vincent Margrove
Counties Ruled: Hex 21, Silverwood Edge
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
Hopefully before the next Council Meeting everyone can have a clean state and a direction of how we want the roleplay to work.
Sir Nickolas- Distinguished
- Posts : 215
Join date : 2013-06-18
Location : USA
Character sheet
Character Name: Simon Lane
Counties Ruled: 18 (Duskfall Sanctuary)
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
For the record, I wasn't trying to argue about what's happened with the siege of Azar or what's led to it. It's really far too late to go there. My only intent was to genuinely discuss the feel of this RP and how most characters seem more opposed to conflict than they should be, given the setting (imo).
Now, what do people think of my specific rule suggestion? Is there a better way to implement such a provision? Do you disagree about the RP not fitting the setting? Let's actually discuss this.
Now, what do people think of my specific rule suggestion? Is there a better way to implement such a provision? Do you disagree about the RP not fitting the setting? Let's actually discuss this.
Rolando- Renowned
- Posts : 88
Join date : 2013-07-29
Age : 36
Character sheet
Character Name: Rolando Juárez
Counties Ruled: Walden, Hex 3
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
We should raid more, but last weeks the rules kept changing and the whole forum isn't that old yet. Despite that, I think most players have started to raid and are doing it this turn, if they aren't replenishing units.
I agree with the reasons and motivations of your proposal, but as far as I'm aware..there isn't really any animosity towards each other simply because someone got raided. Best thing is just to wait with such a penalty until the new council gathering where we can implement it as a decree (or commandment)
I agree with the reasons and motivations of your proposal, but as far as I'm aware..there isn't really any animosity towards each other simply because someone got raided. Best thing is just to wait with such a penalty until the new council gathering where we can implement it as a decree (or commandment)
Valdir- Illustrious
- Posts : 542
Join date : 2013-06-29
Character sheet
Character Name: Valdir Bazzano
Counties Ruled: Talon March [4]
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
Slight problem: That rule is an OOC mechanic. IC, it would make no sense to make it a decree since it's technically intangible. And trying to have it make sense in character would just create a decree that sounds ludicrous ("All lords must raid at least one of their neighbors each month"). It would have to be a rule change from His Great Wonderful Awesomeness himself.
Laisha- Distinguished
- Posts : 133
Join date : 2013-07-07
Age : 34
Location : Pennsylvania, United States
Character sheet
Character Name: Laisha McCulloch
Counties Ruled: North Silverwood, 15
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
Alright, I just wanted to have it delayed for a couple of weeks to see if it's actually needed. We've all got a lot of -shit- thrown over us and with three or four people thinking of quitting..this isn't the time to get stuck in debating OOC rules.
Valdir- Illustrious
- Posts : 542
Join date : 2013-06-29
Character sheet
Character Name: Valdir Bazzano
Counties Ruled: Talon March [4]
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
Actually, being in trouble the perfect time for self-reflection.
Laisha- Distinguished
- Posts : 133
Join date : 2013-07-07
Age : 34
Location : Pennsylvania, United States
Character sheet
Character Name: Laisha McCulloch
Counties Ruled: North Silverwood, 15
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
Right, I've proposed to other in a sub-forum that we try to work things out and start with a clean sheet at the next meeting. That's why implementing such a rule might also be best handled in that week. (new start, new rule?)Laisha wrote:Actually, being in trouble the perfect time for self-reflection.
Valdir- Illustrious
- Posts : 542
Join date : 2013-06-29
Character sheet
Character Name: Valdir Bazzano
Counties Ruled: Talon March [4]
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
My choice of words may have been less than adequate for what I was trying to describe. It's not animosity towards specific individuals that I'm referring to; it's disdain for the idea of conflict IC. We've seen things such as suggestions for Steppe-wide non-aggression pact which personally makes no sense in a raiding culture.Valdir wrote:I agree with the reasons and motivations of your proposal, but as far as I'm aware..there isn't really any animosity towards each other simply because someone got raided.
However, I'm bringing this up because the majority of you might find no issue with that. There's nothing wrong with that. I think it's worth discussing purely so we all know what to expect going forward.
And yeah, if a clean sheet is on the table, actually implementing a new rule would be best reserved for then. But there's no harm in discussing the merits of this suggestion or others now.
Rolando- Renowned
- Posts : 88
Join date : 2013-07-29
Age : 36
Character sheet
Character Name: Rolando Juárez
Counties Ruled: Walden, Hex 3
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
Then, if everybody agrees, we'll take a more positive stance on raiding. Personally I wouldn't mind..plus, all we need is a setting change.
The IC focus from the beginning was on rebuilding the steppe (in my eyes), but this needs to be changed to a more {GoT} Game of Seats kinda idea.
Something that would make more sense if we conclude in the next session that we've successfully 'saved' the Steppe from starvation/whatever.
The IC focus from the beginning was on rebuilding the steppe (in my eyes), but this needs to be changed to a more {GoT} Game of Seats kinda idea.
Something that would make more sense if we conclude in the next session that we've successfully 'saved' the Steppe from starvation/whatever.
Valdir- Illustrious
- Posts : 542
Join date : 2013-06-29
Character sheet
Character Name: Valdir Bazzano
Counties Ruled: Talon March [4]
Re: Aftermath Reborn Rules Discussion
I like the idea Rolando, my only concern is that sometimes players need a turn or two to rebuild their forces. Should it be a 2 turn peace limit, or still require raids each turn (and would it be justifiable to raid with just 1 unit with no hope of success just to see off the peace rule?)
Page 12 of 12 • 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12
Similar topics
» Aftermath Reborn Rules
» Aftermath Reborn Rules Update Log
» Aftermath Reborn OOC
» Aftermath Reborn Lore Draft
» Aftermath Kingmaker
» Aftermath Reborn Rules Update Log
» Aftermath Reborn OOC
» Aftermath Reborn Lore Draft
» Aftermath Kingmaker
:: Marleons :: Library of Marleons
Page 12 of 12
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|